Archive for March, 2012


Advertisements

How did we ever get to a point in the United States of America, where chanting, “USA” is considered RACIST and deserving of an apology???

 

Texas Alamo Heights High Schools USA! Basketball Victory Chant Deemed Racist | San Antonio Edison High School


A Texas school district has filed a complaint after students chanted “U-S-A! U-S-A!” after their basketball team beat a predominantly Hispanic school in a regional tournament. (Image source: San Antonio News-Express)

In what is being described as an incident of racism, a school district in Texas has filed a complaint after some rival high school students chanted “U-S-A! U-S-A!” to celebrate a basketball victory. And some of the students involved have now been punished and forced to apologize.

Student supporters at Alamo Heights High School started the celebratory chant after their team clinched a regional championship against San Antonio Edison High School on Saturday, the San Antonio News-Express reported.

Edison High School is predominantly Hispanic, and officials at the San Antonio Independent School District took the chant as a racial insult from supporters of the largely white Alamo Heights team.

According to the News-Express, the chant lasted only about five seconds before Alamo Heights head coach Andrew Brewer quickly silenced the students. Nevertheless, SAISD athletic director Gil Garza on Tuesday filed a complaint with the University Interscholastic League, which oversees extracurricular activities in Texas public schools.

“Our kids try real hard and work extra hard to get to the regional tournament, and then we have to worry about them being subjected to this kind of insensitivity,” Garza told San Antonio’s KENS-TV. “To be attacked about your ethnicity and being made to feel that you don’t belong in this country is terrible. Why can’t people just applaud our kids? It just gets old and I’m sick of it. Once again, we‘re on pins and needles wondering what’s going to happen.”



 



Since I wrote the article pertaining to Whitney Houston’s death I have been getting lots of inquiries pertaining to my views on the Grammy Awards. Though, I have not watched the Grammy’s in years, since my breaking free from the Matrix, I decided to view them this year. I noticed that nothing has changed, since my last exposures to the awards, the Elite is still at work programming the masses.

For us to fully assess what’s going down with the Grammy’s, we must first delve into the origins of the word Grammy itself. If one wants to fully analyze the meaning and origins of anything they must decode the name of the thing itself. Below is the definition of grammar:
Grammar:A particular analysis of the system and structure of language or of a specific language.

Now, most researchers would stop here, figuring to themselves that this word is harmless, but those of you who follow my research know that I don’t stop at definitions of words, I go into their origins. When one goes into the origins of the word grammar, they will find that this word comes from the Latin root word, grammatical, which means, “(magic) incantation, spells”. Many people don’t realize that the English language was invented as a system of casting spells. This is exactly what has been done to the speakers of the English language, a spell has been cast and placed upon them. English itself is a compilation of many other languages and is basically a bastardized language. Thus, the Grammy Awards could easily be called the Spell Casting Awards (smile).

Don’t believe me on face value research the word grammar on your own and you will find out the truth.

The Grammy Awards adopted it’s name from Thomas Edison’s invention of the gramophone, which was the first device that recorded the human voice, hence the gramophone is a tool used to cast recorded spells through the voice, as the word phone means voice. The Grammy plaque that is won by the nominee is simply a duplicate of Edison’s invention.

The Grammy Awards were started by the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences. According to this Academy, they are an organization of U.S. musicians, producers, recording engineers, and other recording professionals dedicated to improving the quality of life and cultural condition for music and its makers. Anytime one sees the word conditioning a red light should go off in their head. Why and for whom does music have to be conditioned? The above statement, released by the academy themselves, clearly tells you that they are using the power of music as a form of cultural conditioning and programming. Music is used to shape and control the Corporate U.S. culture. In my article about Whitney Houston, I pointed out that there is a secret society within the music industry, well the Grammy Awards and their producers are a faction that act as manipulators behind this secret society. They use the media machine to control the musicians and artists that are apart of this society. Proof of the above statement can be found in how the 54th annual Grammy Awards opened, with Bruce Springsteen’s song “We Take Care of Our Own”. This Song is speaking of the secret society found within the industry and many subliminal messages are found within this song.

Just like many industries found within the U.S. and around the world, the music industry is controlled by an elite group. If a Musician wants to achieve worldly success they have to be accepted into this elite club and this is exactly what is taking place with the Grammy Awards show. The Grammy Awards show serves two purposes, 1. To control and manipulate the masses through media and music, and 2. To initiate and manipulate the upcoming and existing musicians (entertainers) that are coming up in the music world. It is important to note here that the fans, aka the general public, have nothing to do with the nominating and voting procedure that is used by the Grammy’s. It is the programmers and label executives (the controllers of the secret society) who choose and vote for the artists. One would think that the fans would have a say so in who’s music should win the awards since they are the ones spending their hard earned fiat currency (money) on these albums, but no, the fans are mere spectators of these rituals.

Every act that performs at the Grammy’s, are demonstrating a ritual and casting a spell on the audience, especially those who are live and those who are viewing through television. The performances of, Taylor Swift, Nikki Minaj and Jennifer Hudson stuck out to me. All three of these artists were being used to promote a serious ritual and agenda through the songs that they were asked to perform and the way that the performances were acted out. There takes at least 13 witches and wizards to form a coven, which is a group that casts spells. In Taylor Swifts performance there was at least 13 people on stage and if you look at her guitar you will see the number 13 in the center. In Jennifer Hudson performance, she was asked to wear all black, the witches color, and was dressed in a way to depict Whitney Houston, and was asked to sing Whitney’s most popular song. She was obviously harnessing Whitney’s energy from the other side. Nikki Minaj’s performance was based on the Roman Catholic theme because she was demonstrating to the world that she is possessed by psychic entities (demons). The Roman Catholic theme was selected to paint a picture of an attempted exorcism, in which ended with Nikki being exalted and still fully possessed!

What the reader must realize is that even though the Grammy’s are live, the whole show is planned out in advance. Those who are going to win the awards already know in advance that they are going to win. Those who are asked to perform act as mere puppets and the outfits (costumes) and stage set ups are selected for them, they have no choice in these matters.

Adele was the premier act of the awards, winning 6 Grammy’s. The number 6 was chosen for a reason, as I pointed out in other articles, the witches and wizards in the industry are obsessed with the number 6. Adele is being ritualized as the new Amy Winehouse and if she isn’t careful she will be sacrificed just like her. The only other female artist to win 6 Grammy’s was Beyonce. Amy Winehouse worked directly with Rick Rubin, who is a master occultist, and she definitely knew, in advance, that she would be the winner of these awards, she is on the fast track within the industry.

It’s time for the independent musicians and artists to wake up and stop trying to unite with the mind control found within mainstream music. Independent talent needs to come together and work together to form their own societies. The craft of music is sacred and should be preserved by those who were endowed with this gift. But I realize that this message will fall on deaf ears, because of the type of money that is thrown at new talent. Most musicians want to be heard and want to make a living off of their craft and the elites know this, so they throw big figure contracts in these acts faces and they take the bait hook line and sinker. What these artists later realize is that their music is compromised and they are asked to make music that promotes an agenda that benefits the elites and rulers.

I scribe this information not to sway people from joining the society, I merely scribe it to inform that young musician out there about what is really going on behind the scenes, in the music business. This type of information isn’t readily available to the masses or accepted by the masses and I realize that, but a messenger’s duty is to only deliver a clear message. We all have freewill and the right to know both sides of the equation before we make a decision as to which side we want to be on. This message acts as a weight to balance the lopsided scales found within the matrix, it’s up to you what you do with it.

Thank You for Reading!

To subscribe to my mailing list email me at 13signsastrology@gmail.com

For info about me visit my website: http://www.13signsastrology.com

Follow me on twitter @MASTERRAIMHOTEP

Subscribe to my youtube: 13signsastrology


Breitbart (Getty)

Andrew Breitbart’s unexpected death on Thursday has sparked a swift outpouring of grief and remembrances–but also the inevitable conspiracy theories about the timing of the outspoken conservative’s demise.

Speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C., last month, Breitbart claimed he had damning videos of Barack Obama, and planned to release them before the general election.

“[We] are going to vet [Obama] from his college days to show you why racial division and class warfare are central to what hope and change was sold in 2008,” Breitbart told the CPAC crowd.

Steve Bannon, producer of “The Undefeated” and a friend of Breitbart’s, told Fox News’ Sean Hannity on Thursday that the tapes of Obama at Harvard do exist, and that they would be released “in a week or two.”

The news quickly sent conservative bloggers–still shocked by Breitbart’s sudden death–into a frenzy.

“In a stunning coincidence,” Paul Joseph Watson wrote on InfoWars.com, “it appears Andrew Breitbart suffered his untimely death just hours before he was set to release damning video footage that could have sunk Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign.”

Conservative blogger Lawrence Sinclair referenced a conversation he had with Breitbart in Washington D.C. three weeks before. “Andrew said, ‘Wait til they see what happens March first,'” Lawrence Sinclair wrote.

Sinclair also took issue with the wording of Breitbart’s death announcement as it was posted on BigGovernment.com.

“Claims that Andrew died of ‘natural causes’ are the opinions of his attorney Joel Pollak and not the statements of any medical personnel from UCLA or the L.A. County Coroners office,” he wrote. “L.A. Assistant Chief Medical Examiner Ed Winter says autopsy to be done tomorrow (Friday March 2, 2012) and no official cause of death has been determined.”

But the coroner’s office told Yahoo News on Thursday that it is unclear when the results of an autopsy would be released.

With conspiracy theory allegations floating around Sinclair’s website, the comments escalated into more predictions of foul play.

“I do not believe Breitbart died from natural causes,” one commenter on Sinclair’s site wrote. “He died for speaking the truth…He probably should not have announced he had videos of BO’s college days… I find it quite interesting that he died alone on a street. There will be an autopsy and they will decide on natural causes, but there is a way to induce a heart attack in human beings.”

Wrote another commenter: “One thing is for sure. 43-year-old people don’t die from ‘natural causes.'”

But it wasn’t just Sinclair News that housed conspiracy theorists. Conservative site InfoWars.com had plenty of speculations too.

“I’m going to reiterate what I said before,” a commenter wrote on InfoWars.com. “In my opinion THIS GUY GOT ELIMINATED. Plain and simple.” And another wrote: “Anybody who gets too close to the truth will be killed.”

After sending commenters into conspiracy overdrive, Sinclair later clarified his post while simultaneously blaming the media for opening the door to these kinds of allegations because of overzealous reporting.

“In light of the comments which have been posted on this article we want to make something perfectly clear,” Sinclair wrote. “We are not and have not said nor do we believe the death of Andrew Breitbart is the result of anything other than a believed heart attack. We simply reported that different media outlets reporting the cause of death as being of ‘natural causes’ before a cause of death has been determined is wrong and has created this sense of something more sinister.”

But, the Obama tapes weren’t the only things Breitbart had up his sleeve. As Simone Wilson reported on LAWeekly.com, the death of the polarizing 43-year-old came days before he was expected to announce a new Web project.

“This has been Andrew’s obsession,” Joel Pollak told the paper. “He was working incredibly hard.”

Meanwhile, the Daily Mail reported that Breitbart recently told friends that he was “in early talks with CNN about a Crossfire-style show in which he would argue from the right alongside former Rep. Anthony Weiner,” the Congressman whose political career was throttled by Breitbart in 2011. (A spokeswoman for CNN, though, called the report “totally false.”)

One thing that may quell the talk of a conspiracy: Breitbart’s father-in-law told the Associated Press that he had suffered heart problems in 2010.